I can’t produce the repaired HTML, because the input doesn’t contain an article to repair.

Tohle si nenechte ujit

4 souvisejici prispevky

The “raw article” is P2’s refusal message, not HTML. The research notes contain no sources on Czyste powietrze. The only verified facts concern a Slovak regulation, MPSV application channels, and ČSSZ pension increases. Rebuilding the article would mean writing the programme’s dates, eligibility scope, predefinancing rules, and the plná moc guidance from the content plan alone. Those claims have no source, and Gate 1 forbids fabricating facts. The internal links are also unrelated to the topic, and the citation minimums (10 links across 6 domains) can’t be met from this evidence.

To proceed, one of these is needed:

1. **Research for the programme.** Supply sources with URLs and tiers from the official Polish programme operator or government, including dated announcements. Then I can run the 14 gates on a full draft.
2. **A narrower article.** If the topic changes to something the evidence covers, such as ČSSZ pension increases for work during retirement (0.4% per 360 days, activity up to 31. 12. 2024) or MPSV application channels, I can validate and repair that. It would need its own citations and internal links.