I can’t run the repair because the **Raw article (P2 output)** field is empty. No HTML was included, so there is nothing to validate or repair. I won’t write the article from the research notes, since that would be new content rather than a repair, and the instructions say not to change or invent content.

Tohle si nenechte ujit

4 souvisejici prispevky

Please paste the P2 article HTML and I’ll apply Gates 1–14 and the intro, language, and output checks.

Before you resend, these issues in the research and content-plan inputs will probably affect the repair:

– **Content plan references Nicopods and Pouchline** (strength range 8–150 mg, delivery times, and the “3 z 5” stat). None of these appear in the facts, verified facts, or sources. Gate 3 will downgrade or remove any claim that depends on them.
– **Strength figures conflict.** Regional variations say ZYN is “3 a 6 mg” in the US, while the facts say “1,5–8 mg” and the verified facts say “1,5–8 mg, ZYN Ultra 9 a 11 mg.” Gate 4 uses verified_facts, so the 1,5–8 mg value should replace the other.
– **Tier share fails.** `tier_1_2_share_min_60pct` is false, and most price and potency claims are tier 3 with low or medium confidence. Gate 11 will require hedging or moving them to the rumor list.
– **Internal links.** The dataset has no related article, and the two suggested links are unrelated medical pages. Under the contract, internal links need relevance, so I’d expect to drop them unless you add a tobacco or nicotine article to the site.
– **Research confidence is low.** Gate 10 will push items toward the rumor list, so the confirmed list may end up short.